Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Will W re-elect Blagojevich? And who is running for Treasurer?

It's pretty clear that George W. Bush is politically radioactive and that 2005 has been a very good Democratic Party year.

It's unlikely to get much better for the Republican Party in 2006, as the Iraq occupation isn't getting any better (that's what happens in occupations -- people tend not to like having a foreign army, liberators or not, setting up permanent bases), the economy doesn't seem to be getting any better, the corruption around D.C. isn't getting any better and still, still, still the radical wing of the GOP pushes for even more tax cuts for wealthy people.

So, if the national Republican Party is not much help nowadays, how are they going to be in a position to help Judy Baar Topinka?

I can tell you this: George Bush won't be campaigning with her.

Neither will Dick Cheney.

Those are two unpopular people in Illinois.

The Republicans will likely have a lot of money (because they are the party of money), and I guess they can throw some of it at Topinka for Governor '06.

But I have to think that the downward spiral that the D.C. Republicans are in will be more of a cost to Topinka than the money they can throw at her campaign.

Too bad we don't have gubernatorial elections the same year as presidential elections. We'd never lose the governor's office.

(And Speaker Madigan said a few years ago that he wishes the same thing....he cited that move to create 'off-year' gubernatorial elections as one of the mistakes of our state constitution -- he was a delegate to the 1969-1970 constitutional convention known as con-con).

But back to the fun stuff: who will be our newest statewide Democrat?

The filing deadline is December 19th, and I'm betting that in the next 40 days, there will be at least one other candidate for Treasurer besides Paul Mangieri. And as of right now, Representative John Fritchey is "not out" of the race.

4 comments:

Lazerlou said...

I don't think Dems in Illinois really needed Bush's failure to keep the governor. Only maybe if the repubs fielded some brilliant, handsome, charming, moderate candidate. But Judy BT? Please. You overestimate the legitimacy of "centrist" people's reasons for voting one way or the other, Dan.

Bill Baar said...

Bush may be radioactive in 2006 but it's the Dems who will explode for 2008.

I remember the 1968 convention and there getting ready for a repeat.

One reason the party is stuck on the "Bush Lied" theme is its a way to duck for a time the inevitable party crack up over the war.

I don't the Democrats will survive this crack up.

respectful said...

The GOP is the party of money, but A-Rod has $!4 million? Does that make him an honorary Republican?

Dan Johnson-Weinberger said...

You're the party of money if you make the rich richer. You're the party of the people if you make the people better off. There are a few Republicans who work to make regular people better off and there are a few Democrats who work primarily to make rich people richer. But they are the exception. The size of the campaign warchest (which, of course, is not the personal asset of the Governor) is irrelevant. But....nice try.